I
n The Book of Mormon, there is an account of the prophet
Abinidi. In preaching to King Noah, Abinidi spoke words that have baffled many.
“And now Abinadi said unto them: I would that ye should
understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and
shall redeem his people.
And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son—
The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son—
And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth.
And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people.”
And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son—
The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son—
And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth.
And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people.”
Many have scratched their heads when trying to understand
these verses. Let me explain what helps me personally understand them better.
Let me substitute the word “Son” with “mortal”, and the word “Father” with
“immortal”.
‘God himself shall come down among the children of men, and
shall redeem his people.
And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called mortal, and having subjected the flesh to the immortal, being both immortal and mortal—
Immortal, because he was conceived by the power of God; and mortal, because of the flesh; thus becoming both immortal and mortal—
... And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the mortal to the immortal, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people.’
And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called mortal, and having subjected the flesh to the immortal, being both immortal and mortal—
Immortal, because he was conceived by the power of God; and mortal, because of the flesh; thus becoming both immortal and mortal—
... And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the mortal to the immortal, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people.’
Jesus is unique in all of the history of the world; for He is
the only person ever born on this earth that was both mortal and immortal! He
had a mortal mother and an Immortal Father. This is the very thing that gave
Him the power to redeem all of mankind! And that is the point Abinidi is
explaining.
And so, Jesus is both mortal and immortal! He is both “the
Father and the Son—The Father, because he
was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son“. He is
mortal because Mary is His mother. He is immortal because God is His Father.
But if this is the case, why did Abinidi simply not use the
words mortal and immortal instead of the Father and the Son? I’ll provide a
possible reason, but first…
Jesus could not be a personal God if He was not mortal (the
Son). He could not be a saving God if He was not immortal (the Father). Jesus
needed to be both mortal and immortal to be able to accomplish the atonement.
Without being immortal (the Father), Jesus could not
accomplish the atonement because 1) the pain of the atonement would cause a
mortal would succumb to death before the full price could be paid, and 2) the
atonement required an infinite and eternal and perfect sacrifice, not a mortal,
temporal, imperfect one.
But Jesus also needed to be mortal (the Son). He needed to
experience everything that we mortals experience—and experience them as a mortal—and still remain sinless and
unblemished. Jesus never unfairly used His immortal side to live His perfect,
sinless life.
The preparations for the atonement were the entirety of
Jesus's mortal life before the Garden of Gethsemane, and those preparations
were absolutely required before Jesus could be a perfect and worthy sacrifice. And
Jesus needed to be mortal (the Son) to experience those preparations.
Then once the preparations had been made, the atonement
could be offered for all of God’s children. And Jesus had to be immortal (the
Father) to both 1) accomplish and 2) endure that atonement.
Why The Confusion
To return the question posed above, why did Abinidi simply
not use the words mortal and immortal instead of the Father and the Son?
The short answer is that “the Father” and “the Son” are simply
titles that Jesus is known by, titles that evoke the concepts of “mortal” and
“immortal” (just as the title of Messiah evokes the concept of redemption).
The long answer:
We are usually familiar with the explanations as to when and
in what contexts Jesus can rightfully be called “the Father”. There is a very
clear First Presidency statement on this matter. But are we equally familiar
with the explanations as to when and in what contexts Jesus can rightfully be
called “the Son”? After all, Jesus isn’t always referred to as the Son of God. And,
be it remembered that Abinadi is prophesying at a time before Jesus' birth.
So, what title was Jesus known by in Abinidi’s time? Most
likely, He was known simply as “God”. In all of his sermons, Abinidi consistently
referred to Jesus as simply “God”. Even in the verse under discussion, Abinidi
says “God himself shall come down
among the children of men”.
If this was the title that Jesus was known by, and then
Abinidi introduced the titles of “the Father” and “the Son”, then both titles
would require some explanation and clarification on Abinidi’s part, would they
not? And so, Abinadi explains how and in what ways God Himself is “the Father”
and how and in what ways He is “the Son”. In this context, read these verses
again:
“God himself shall come down among the children of men, and
shall redeem his people.
And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son
of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the
Father and the Son—“
Abinidi has introduced two new titles, so he explains what
they mean:
“The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God;
and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son—And they
are one God”.
Abindi is explaining that he is still talking about the same
person, this one God he has been referring to the whole time.
Conclusion
As a final note, consider these words spoken by Jesus to
Nephi the prophet just before He (Jesus) was about to born into this world:
“On the morrow come I into the world... Behold, I come unto
my own…, to do the will, both of the Father and of the Son—of the Father
because of me, and of the Son because of my flesh. And behold, the time is at
hand...”
It is not coincidental that Jesus referred to Himself as
this dualistic Father and Son right before He was about to be born. He was just
about to become both mortal and immortal! He, Immortal, was just about to be
born Mortal. He was just about to become both the Father and the Son! He was
just about to live the demands both mortality and immortality, and remain
perfect throughout it all. He was just about to "do the will, both of the
Father (immortal) and of the Son (mortal)." Can any more pure and perfect
doctrine be found in all of holy writ?
And further, are we asked to believe that Joseph Smith not
only made up such perfect doctrine, but that he knew precisely where to include
this marvelous doctrine, right before Christ's birth; at the exact moment when
Christ became both the Father and the Son; both immortal and mortal? Such
assertions stretch the bounds of reasons well beyond imagination. The Book of
Mormon is true.
A Past Talk
If you are interested in even further exposition on these concepts, here is a
Christmas talk I wrote a few years back:
“The Father hath life in himself.” Life dwells in God
independently. In other words, the Father is an immortal, exalted, resurrected
being of flesh and bones who cannot die. This was one of the transcendent and
fundamental truths restored in the first vision given to Joseph Smith.
Mortal man does not have life within himself as God
does. Life does not dwell independently within mortals. All mortal life depends
upon God, and the life that dwells
independently in him, to sustain their own life. All things live because of
the Father. He is the source of life; and the one who upholds, preserves, and
continues it.
The Father hath given to the Son to have life in himself.
Said Jesus: “As the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to
have life in himself.” Life dwells in the Father independently. And he has
given this same power to the Son; the Son inherits from the Father; an immortal
Father passes on to his mortal Son the power of immortality; it comes as a
natural inheritance. The Son inherited the power of immortality from His
Father. (These two paragraphs are based on many scriptures in John.)
Only Jesus could bring about the resurrection of all mankind
and redeem us from our sins. God the Father gave him this power. In Helaman
5:11 we read that the Son “hath power given unto him from the Father to redeem
all mankind from their sins because of repentance”. The power of immortality
is, in part at least, the power that the Father gave to the Son to enable
Him to redeem mankind, which power He received as a natural inheritance.
This power of immortality was essential to the Saviorʼs
ability to accomplish and endure the atonement, for the extreme suffering
associated with the atonement was beyond the power of mortal man either
to accomplish or endure.
Mortal man could not accomplish the atonement because
all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Because we have all
broken the laws of God, none of us are able to pay the price for the sins the
world. Only a sinless sacrifice, only an infinite and eternal
sacrifice (remember the power of immortality that was given by the
Father to the Son); only an infinite and eternal sacrifice will
suffice for the sins of the world.
Neither could mortal man endure the suffering of the
atonement because the mortal body would succumb to death under such duress. For
behold, Christ did suffer “temptations, and pain of body, hunger, thirst, and
fatigue, even more than mortal man can suffer, except it be unto
death; for behold, blood came from every pore, so great was his anguish for
the wickedness and the abominations of his people.”
Only Christ, who had the power of immortality given to Him
by the Father, could accomplish and endure the atonement. This
power of immortality, this power to accomplish and endure the atonement, this
power to redeem all mankind was given to Christ from the Father through the
birthing process. From God who is His Father Jesus Christ inherited the
power of immortality, the power to live forever. From Mary, who is his mother,
Jesus inherited the power of mortality, the power to die. Jesus only of all mankind--Jesus
the Son of the Living God, Jesus the Son of the mortal virgin--this One Man of
all men had power to live or to die. This then is the miracle of Jesus, the
miracle of His birth, life, mission, and atoning sacrifice. Because Jesus
Christ is the literal Son of God, he has power given unto Him from the Father
to save and exalt all who will in the sincerity of their hearts obey His gospel
and believe in him AS the Literal, Eternal Son of the Literal,
Eternal Father.
Comments
Post a Comment